 |
|
 |
 |
|
Risk Assessment Studies
Report No. 20
VIBRIO SPECIES IN SEAFOOD
August 2005
Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
|
This is a publication of the Food and Public
Health Branch of the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
(FEHD) of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region. Under no circumstances should the research data contained
herein be reproduced, reviewed or abstracted in part or in whole,
or in conjunction with other publications or research work unless
a written permission is obtained from FEHD. Acknowledgement is
required if other parts of this publication are used.
|
Correspondence:
Risk Assessment Section
Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
43/F, Queensway Government Offices,
66 Queensway, Hong Kong
Email: enquiries@fehd.gov.hk
| Abstract |
| Vibrios are associated with live seafood as they form part of
the indigenous microflora of the marine environment. Foodborne infections
with Vibrio spp. are common in Asia. In Hong Kong, V. parahaemolyticus
continued to be the top causative agent among all the reported food
poisoning outbreaks in recent years. According to the figures provided
by the Department of Health (DH), 552 confirmed V. parahaemolyticus
food poisoning outbreaks affecting 2725 persons were reported during
1999 to 2003. Among these 552 outbreaks, 313 (56.7%) were due to
consumption of seafood. Inadequate cooking (59.7%) and contamination
by raw food (23.6%) were the main contribution factors for these
cases. Cholera appears as sporadic diseases in Hong Kong. Information
from the DH showed that there were totally 49 local cholera cases
reported during 1999 to 2003. The suspected food item was identified
in about half of the cases, of which, seafood accounted for about
80%. According to a Study on the Ecology of V. cholerae
in Marine Water and Live Seafood, water samples taken from typhoon
shelters and shoreline waters were found to have higher chance of
detecting V. cholerae from open waters and fish culture
zones. Water samples which were tested positive for V. cholerae
also have higher E. coli counts. The results also implied
that if V. cholerae is the concern for the abstraction
of seawater for keeping live seafood, both the site where the water
is abstracted and the E. coli count are important parameters
to be considered. Good manufacturing practices should always be
observed by the trade to minimise the risk of cholera and vibrio
food poisoning associated with the consumption of seafood products.
Hygienic quality of fish tank water in particular the source water
for keeping live seafood is also important. |
| OBJECTIVE |
|
The aims of this paper are to evaluate the local situation of
Vibrio species (spp.) in seafood products and to make recommendations
to reduce risk associated with the consumption of seafood.
|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
2. Seafood is a nutritious food that constitutes one of the desirable
components of a healthy diet. Nevertheless, there are health risks
associated with the consumption of seafood. One of the major risks
involves the consumption of raw or undercooked seafood that may
be naturally contaminated by foodborne pathogens present in the
marine environment. Such risk is further increased if the food
is mishandled during processing where pathogens could multiply
exponentially under favourable conditions.
3. In contrast to most other foodborne pathogens, Vibrio spp.
have the aquatic habitat as their natural niche. As a result,
vibrios are most commonly associated with seafood as natural contaminants.
Foodborne infections with Vibrio spp. are common in Asia [1],
including Hong Kong.
|
| Vibrio Species |
|
4. Vibrio spp. are Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic motile
curved rods with a single polar flagellum. Among the members of
the genus, 12 species have so far been reported to be pathogenic
to humans, where eight of these may be associated with foodborne
infections of the gastrointestinal tract.[2]
Most of these foodborne infections are caused by V. parahaemolyticus
and V. cholerae, and to a lesser extent by V. vulnificus.[3]
The following paragraphs highlighted the characteristics of these
three vibrios.
V. cholerae
5. Among the vibrios, V. cholerae is of most concern
because of its ability to cause cholera. V. cholerae
can be divided into serogroups on the basis of the O antigen.
Of the more than 200 V. cholerae serogroups that exist,
only O1 and O139 are associated with the epidemiological features
and clinical syndrome of cholera. However, organisms of V.
cholerae serogroups other than O1 and O139 (non-O1 non-O139
serogroups) have been associated with sporadic cases of foodborne
outbreaks of gastroenteritis, but have not spread in epidemic
form.[4] The most important virulence factor
associated with V. cholerae O1 and O139 serogroups is
the cholera toxin. Non-O1 non-O139 serogroups are generally nontoxigenic.
6. Cholera remains a public health threat globally causing hundreds
of thousand cases every year. However, this threat is much reduced
in places with safe water supply and good standards of hygiene
and sanitation. Cholera is an acute intestinal infection. Its
incubation period ranges from a few hours to five days, usually
two to three days. Although asymptomatic infection is more common,
clinical illness may be exhibited. Symptoms include a sudden onset
of profuse painless watery diarrhoea that can quickly lead to
rapid dehydration, acidosis, circulatory collapse, hypoglycaemia
in children, renal failure and death if treatment is not promptly
given. Nausea and vomiting also occurs early in the course of
illness. Cholera is transmitted through ingestion of food or water
contaminated with the bacterium, especially via faeces or vomitus
of infected persons, directly or indirectly. Human volunteer feeding
studies utilising healthy individuals have demonstrated that the
infective dose is approximately one million organisms. However,
conditions which decrease acidity in the stomach such as antacid
consumption markedly lowers the infective dose.[5]
7. Gastroenteritis caused by V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139
serogroups is milder than cholera. The incubation period ranges
from 12 to 24 hours in outbreaks[4] and is characterised
by diarrhoea and abdominal cramps. About 70% of infected individuals
will have fever. Nausea and vomiting are reported in 21% and bloody
diarrhoea in 25% of cases.[6] Cases of non-O1
non-O139 gastroenteritis are usually linked to consumption of
raw or undercooked seafood, particularly shellfish. It is suspected
that large numbers (more than one million) of the organism must
be ingested to cause illness.[7]
8. V. cholerae is a mesophilic organism that grows in
the temperature range of 10 to 43oC, with optimum growth
at 37oC. The pH optimum for growth is 7.6 although
it can grow in the pH range of 5.0 to 9.6. V. cholerae
can grow in the salt range of 0.1 to 4.0% NaCl, while optimum
is 0.5% NaCl.6
V. parahaemolyticus
9. V. parahaemolyticus was first identified as a foodborne
pathogen in Japan in the 1950s. By the late 1960s and early 1970s,
V. parahaemolyticus was recognised as a cause of diarrhoeal
disease worldwide, although most common in Asia and the United
States.[3] In Hong Kong, V. parahaemolyticus
continued to be the top causative agent among all the reported
food poisoning outbreaks in recent years.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]
10. The illness caused by V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning
is a gastroenteritis characterised by watery diarrhoea and abdominal
cramps in most cases, with nausea, vomiting, fever and headache.
The incubation period is usually between 12 and 24 hours[4]
and the disease usually resolves in three days.[13]
The infection is typically acquired through consumption of contaminated
seafood. These could be raw or inadequately cooked, or that have
been cross-contaminated by improper handling. Poor temperature
control of storage favours bacterial proliferation. The total
dose of greater than one million may cause disease. This dose
may be markedly lowered by coincident consumption of antacids
or presumably by food with buffering capacity.[14]
One volunteer feeding study done in Japan estimated that 2 x 105
to 3 x 107 cells have to be ingested for disease.[15]
11. V. parahaemolyticus is a slightly halophilic bacterium.
The optimum growth NaCl concentrations range from 2 to 4% and
poor growth is exhibited in media below 0.5% NaCl. The bacterium
is inactivated rapidly in distilled water and growth at levels
of 10% NaCl is inhibited.[16] The organism grows
at a temperature range between 5 and 43oC, with optimum
growth at 37oC. The optimum pH range for growth is
7.8 to 8.6, although it can grow in the pH range of 4.8 to 11.[13]
V. vulnificus
12. V. vulnificus is an opportunistic pathogen that
can cause wound infections and primary septicaemia. This bacterium
has less often been described as a cause of gastroenteritis, and
its role as a primary cause of gastrointestinal disease remains
to be determined.[17]
13. Wound infections occur in connection with puncture wounds
after handling of raw seafood or trauma and exposure to saline
environments that harbour the organism.[18]
14. The primary septicaemic form is the major form of infection
with V. vulnificus which involves a rapidly progressing
septicemia with few gastrointestinal signs. The incubation period
is from seven hours to several days. The most frequent symptoms
are fever, chills, nausea and cardiovascular hypotension. This
form of disease is predominantly associated with the consumption
of raw bivalve shellfish containing the organism by individuals
with underlying chronic disease, particularly liver disease.[18]
In these individuals, the microorganism enters the blood stream,
resulting in septic shock, rapidly followed by death in many cases
(about 50%). Over 70% of infected individuals have distinctive
bulbous skin lesions. For predisposed persons, septicemia can
presumably occur with doses of less than 100 total organisms.[19]
15. V. vulnificus is very similar to V. parahaemolyticus
in cultural characteristics and sensitivity to processing procedures.
It differs principally in salt requirement and tolerance, growing
in media containing between 0.1 and 5% NaCl. Same as V. parahaemolyticus,
the organism grows optimally at 37oC although it can
grow at a temperature range between 8 and 43oC. The
pH range for growth of V. vulnificus is 5 to 10, with
an optimum at 7.8.[20]
|
| Vibrio spp. and seafood |
|
16. Vibrios are abundant in the aquatic environment. Most of
them require 2 to 3% NaCl or a seawater base for optimal growth.[15]
Vibrios are associated with live seafood as they form part of
the indigenous microflora of the environment at the time of seafood
capture or harvest. Healthy live fish is protected by its immune
system and therefore bacteria cannot grow in its flesh. When the
fish dies, the immune system no longer functions and the bacteria
present are able to proliferate freely.[21]
In addition, bacteria may be found on the skin, chitinous shell,
gills as well as the intestinal tracts of fish or shellfish.[22]
If subsequent handling is improper and that there is no or inadequate
pathogen reduction step (e.g. cooking) afterwards, the level of
bacteria in the final product may increase to such an extent that
may present a health risk to consumers.
17. Molluscan bivalves are filter feeders and they tend to accumulate
microorganisms in the surrounding waters which may also contain
vibrios. They are usually grown and harvested in shallow, near-shore
estuarine waters and are therefore likely to harbour high concentrations
of pathogenic organisms including pathogenic vibrios. As they
often are eaten raw or after a very mild heat treatment, they
constitute a significant health risk to the consumers.[21]
18. Among the potentially pathogenic vibrios occurring naturally
on fish and shellfish, V. parahaemolyticus is the most
widespread. Endogenous marine species of V. cholerae
can also be isolated from fish during cholera outbreaks. It has
been suggested that vibrios are the most common bacterial causative
agents in food poisoning resulting from the consumption of shellfish.[22]
19. Water temperature can greatly affect the vibrio levels in
seafood. Vibrios can multiply rapidly between 20 and 40oC.
Growth at the optimum temperature (37oC) can be very
rapid and generation times of 9 to 10 minutes have been reported.[6]
V. parahaemolyticus is primarily associated with coastal
inshore waters rather than the open sea. It is rarely isolated
from water with temperatures below 15oC.[23],[13]
Factors affecting growth and survival of vibrios in seafood
i. Effect of temperature
20. Growth of pathogenic vibrios occurs optimally at around 37oC
although the maximum and minimum growth temperatures are 43oC
and 5oC respectively.[23] All vibrios
are sensitive to heat. In shellfish, heating to produce an internal
temperature of at least 60oC for several minutes appears
sufficient to eliminate the pathogenic vibrios.[17]
Chilling and refrigeration are critical control measures to prevent
growth of these microorganisms.
ii. Effect of pH and other factors
21. Vibrios are acid sensitive and grow best at pH values slightly
above neutrality, i.e. 7.5 to 8.5.[23] They
are also sensitive to drying. While V. parahaemolyticus
has an absolute Na+ ion requirement and shows optimal
growth at about 2 to 4% NaCl, freshwater inactivates this organism.
|
| LOCAL FOODBORNE DISEASE FIGURES |
|
22. Food poisoning and cholera are notifiable infectious diseases
under the Quarantine and Prevention of Diseases Ordinance, Cap.141,
Laws of Hong Kong. The following paragraphs summarised the figures
concerning local food poisoning outbreaks due to V. parahaemolyticus
and local cholera cases.
V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning
23. V. parahaemolyticus ranked first as the most common
causative agent of food poisoning outbreaks in Hong Kong in recent
years. According to the figures provided by the Department of
Health (DH), 552 confirmed V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning
outbreaks affecting 2725 persons were reported during 1999 to
2003. Table 1 showed the
breakdown of these cases by food group.
Table 1: V. parahaemolyticus Food Poisoning
by Food Group (1999 to 2003)
|
Food Group
|
Number of confirmed case (%)*
|
Number of persons affected (%)*
|
|
Seafood
|
313 (56.7%)
|
1465 (53.8%)
|
|
Mixed Dishes
|
68 (12.3%)
|
449 (16.5%)
|
|
Meat, Meat Products and Offals
|
54 (9.8%)
|
314 (11.5%)
|
|
Cereals and Cereal Products
|
39 (7.1%)
|
89 (3.3%)
|
|
Poultry and Poultry Products
|
29 (5.3%)
|
187 (6.9%)
|
|
Fruits, Vegetables and their Products
|
25 (4.5%)
|
98 (3.6%)
|
|
Others
|
15 (2.7%)
|
75 (2.8%)
|
|
Unknown
|
9 (1.6%)
|
48 (1.8%)
|
|
Total
|
552 (100%)
|
2725 (100%)
|
* Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding of figures.
24. Among all the food groups, seafood is the most frequently
incriminated food which caused V. parahaemolyticus food
poisoning outbreak. It accounted for 56.7% of the total number
of confirmed cases. Table 2
summarised the various seafood items which caused V. parahaemolyticus
food poisoning.
Table
2: V. parahaemolyticus Food Poisoning Outbreaks Due to
Consumption of Seafood (1999 to 2003)
|
Food Group
|
Food type
|
Number of confirmed case (%)*
|
Number of persons affected (%)*
|
|
Crustaceans
|
Crab
|
46 (14.7%)
|
180 (12.3%)
|
|
Shrimp / Prawns
|
43 (13.7%)
|
299 (20.4%)
|
|
Lobster
|
1 (0.3%)
|
2 (0.1%)
|
|
Subtotal
|
90 (28.7%)
|
481 (32.8%)
|
|
Gastropods
|
Squid / Octopus
|
55 (17.6%)
|
167 (11.4%)
|
|
Jellyfish
|
27 (8.6%)
|
204 (13.9%)
|
|
Subtotal
|
82 (26.2%)
|
371 (25.3%)
|
|
Bivalve Shellfish
|
Mussels
|
15 (4.8%)
|
49 (3.3%)
|
|
Oyster
|
12 (3.8%)
|
41 (2.8%)
|
|
Clams
|
12 (3.8%)
|
45 (3.1%)
|
|
Scallops
|
6 (1.9%)
|
24 (1.6%)
|
|
Other Bivalve Shellfish
|
4 (1.3%)
|
29 (2.0%)
|
|
Subtotal
|
49 (15.7%)
|
188 (12.8%)
|
|
Others / Unspecified
|
Sashimi
|
30 (9.6%)
|
113 (7.7%)
|
|
Marine Product Other
|
18 (5.8%)
|
138 (9.4%)
|
|
Marine Product Unspecified
|
1 (0.3%)
|
4 (0.3%)
|
|
Subtotal
|
49 (15.7%)
|
255 (17.4%)
|
|
Fish
|
Marine Fish
|
41 (13.1%)
|
166 (11.3%)
|
|
Freshwater Fish
|
2 (0.6%)
|
4 (0.3%)
|
|
Subtotal
|
43 (13.7%)
|
170 (11.6%)
|
|
Total
|
|
313 (100%)
|
1465 (100%)
|
* Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding of figures
25. Of the 313 confirmed V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning
outbreaks due to consumption of seafood during 1999 to 2003 (Table
1), inadequate cooking was the main contribution
factor which accounts for 59.7% of the cases, and this was followed
by contamination by raw food which accounts for 23.6% of the cases.
These two factors contributed to more than 80% of all the cases.
Other factors included other reasons for cross contamination,
improper storage, inadequate reheating and food prepared too far
in advance. (Table 3)
Table 3: Primary
Contributing Factors* of V. parahaemolyticus Food Poisoning
Outbreaks Due to Consumption of Seafood (1999 to 2003)
|
Contributing factor
|
No. of confirmed case (% of total) †
|
|
Inadequate cooking
|
187 (59.7%)
|
|
Contamination by raw food
|
74 (23.6%)
|
|
Contaminated raw food
|
14 (4.5%)
|
|
Improper storage of cooked food
|
8 (2.6%)
|
|
Contamination by utensil
|
7 (2.2%)
|
|
Improper holding temperature
|
6 (1.9%)
|
|
Contaminated processed food
|
5 (1.6%)
|
|
Inadequate reheating
|
5 (1.6%)
|
|
Others / Unknown
|
4 (1.3%)
|
|
Food prepared too far in advance
|
3 (1.0%)
|
* More than one factor may be involved in an outbreak.
† Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding of
figures.
Cholera cases
26. Information from the DH showed that there were totally 49
local cholera cases reported during 1999 to 2003. The suspected
food item was identified in about half of the cases, of which,
seafood accounted for about 80% (Table
4)
Table 4: Local
Cholera Cases by Food Group (1999 to 2003)
|
Food Group
|
Number of cases (%)
|
|
Unknown / unspecified
|
25 (51.0%)
|
|
Seafood
|
19 (38.8%)
|
|
Others
|
5 (10.2%)
|
|
Total
|
49 (100%)
|
|
| STUDY
ON THE ECOLOGY OF V. CHOLERAE IN MARINE WATER AND LIVE
SEAFOOD |
|
27. Following the isolation of V. cholerae in fish tank
water of two retail outlets selling live seafood in 2003, there
were calls to further strengthen the control the microbiological
quality of fish tank water and abstraction of seawater for keeping
live seafood. The limited number of local study on ecology of
V. cholerae suggested that the non-O1 non-O139 serogroup
were isolated in both local seawater and seafood samples.[24],[25]
However, these studies were limited by small sample numbers and
limited coverage of sampling locations.
28. In light of the above, a one-year study was conducted in
2004 by an interdepartmental task force (TF) which comprised representatives
from the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD), Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD), Environmental Protection
Department (EPD) and Department of Health (DH) in 2004 to fill
in the existing data gaps. The objectives of this study are to
determine: (i) the occurrence and distribution of V. cholerae
in local waters and its association with environmental factors
including the E. coli count; (ii) the occurrence of V. cholerae
in live fish kept in fish culture zones and its association with
other parameters.
29. A total of 90 water samples were taken from 15 selected sampling
sites of four categories (Annex I).
The V. cholerae count, E. coli count, salinity
and water temperature were determined. Twenty-four live fish samples
that were mature live fish ready for market were collected at
the four selected fish culture zones.
30. Results showed that no V. cholerae O1 or O139 serogroups
were detected in any of the samples. During the 12-month study
period, 14 (16%) out of all the 90 water samples were tested positive
for V. cholerae non-O1 non-O139 serogroups. Among these
14 samples, eight (57%) were from typhoon shelters, five (36%)
were from shorelines close to the wholesale fish markets and one
(7%) was from a fish culture zone. There was significant difference
among the four sampling site categories in terms of isolation
of V. cholerae in water samples (c2 test,
p < 0.001). The isolation rate of V. cholreae
in water samples from typhoon shelters and shoreline (13 out of
42 water samples, or 31%) is significantly higher than that from
fish culture zone (1 out of 24, or 4%) (c2 test, p
= 0.01) and that in open waters (0 out of 24, or 0%) (c2
test, p = 0.002).
31. Water samples which were tested positive for V. cholerae
were found to contain significantly higher E. coli count
(Mann-Whitney U Test, p < 0.001). When analyses were
conducted within the samples collected at typhoon shelters and
shoreline waters, those water samples which were tested positive
for V. cholerae were found to contain significantly higher
E. coli (Mann-Whitney U Test, p = 0.049).
32. No correlation between V. cholerae counts and water
temperature (p = 0.96) and salinity of seawater (p
= 0.89) was found in the study.
33. Twenty-four water samples were taken from the sampling sites
within the open waters category and none of them were found positive
with V. cholerae.
34. As for the 24 live fish samples taken from fish culture zones,
none of the fish samples were tested positive for V. cholerae
even though one water sample taken from a fish culture zone was
found positive with the non-O1 non-O139 V. cholerae.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
35. While vibrios are natural habitants of seawater, it is not
surprising that the majority (56.7%) of V. parahaemolyticus
food poisoning outbreaks are caused by the consumption of seafood
(Table 1). Among all the
seafood items, crustaceans, including crab, shrimp/prawns and
lobster, represented the highest percentage (28.7%) of incriminated
seafood involved in V. parahaemolyticus outbreaks
(Table 2). Nearly 60% of all the
V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning cases by seafood occurred
in 1999 to 2003 were due to the consumption of inadequately cooked
food (Table 3). The second
and third major contributing factors for V. parahaemolyticus
food poisoning was due to the consumption of food contaminated
by raw food and the consumption of contaminated raw food respectively.
Thorough cooking and avoidance of cross contamination hold the
key to successful prevention of V. parahaemolyticus food
poisoning.
36. Because of the availability of safe water supply to the population
and a reasonably high standard of sanitation locally, cholera
no longer appears in an epidemic form in Hong Kong. However, since
V. cholerae are widely distributed in temperate and tropical
aquatic environment, in particular estuarine waters and that cholera
is endemic in this part of the world, cholera still appears in
Hong Kong as sporadic diseases. For the local cholera cases in
which a suspected food item was identified, most of them were
related to the consumption of seafood (Table
4).
37. In the Study on the Ecology of V. cholerae in Marine
Water and Live Seafood, water samples taken from typhoon shelters
and shoreline waters were found to have higher chance of detecting
V. cholerae than that from open waters and fish culture
zones. Typhoon shelters and shoreline waters (especially the shorelines
in urban areas) are sites which are considered more polluted.
Water samples which were tested positive for V. cholerae
also have higher E. coli counts. The results implied
that if V. cholerae is the concern when considering abstracting
seawater for keeping live seafood, both the site where the water
is abstracted and the E. coli count are important parameters
to be considered. Abstraction of seawater from typhoon shelters
and shoreline in urbanised areas for this purpose is therefore
not recommended.
|
| CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
38. To minimise the potential risk of cholera and vibrio food
poisoning due to the consumption of seafood products, good manufacturing
and handling practices should always be observed. Attention should
also be paid to the hygienic quality of fish tank water for keeping
live seafood. Source of the seawater is of particular importance.
The followings are some recommendations:
Advice to Trade
(A) Handling of raw materials
- Purchase raw materials from reputable and reliable suppliers.
- Buy only those shellfish which are fresh, with intact shell
and free from abnormal odour.
- Do not abstract seawater from shoreline in urbanised areas
and typhoon shelters for keeping live seafood. Use of synthetic
seawater is more desirable than the use of natural seawater.
- Keep live fish and shellfish separately in different fish
tanks equipped with proper filtration and disinfection systems.
These systems should be regularly maintained. References can
be made to FEHD¡¦s Guidelines on the Filtration and Disinfection
Facilities for Fish Tank Water.[26]
- Scrub and rinse shellfish in clean water. Remove internal
organs of shellfish.
(B) Manufacturing and storage
- Adopt a first-in-first-out principle to store raw materials
and keep them at appropriate temperatures.
- Avoid holding chilled ingredients and finished products at
above 4o C for more than 2 hours.
- Reserve a specific portion of a refrigerator or a designated
refrigerator for storage of seafood to be eaten raw, such as
sashimi and oysters. Seafood shall be properly wrapped or covered
before storage.
- Remove the shells of shellfish, as far as possible, before
cooking as it impedes heat penetration.
- Cook food thoroughly before consumption. High-risk food such
as oysters shall be cooked in boiling water for not less than
five minutes.
- Avoid preparing ready-to-eat dishes and raw foods at the
same time.
- Avoid preparing dishes in large quantities at one time and
too far in advance.
- Display seafood at 4o C or below or 60o C
or above in buffet settings.
(C) Equipment, utensil and personal hygiene
- Establish a clean-up and disinfection programme to clean
and sterilise equipment and utensils including fish tanks, refrigerators,
chopping boards, choppers, containers and mixers.
- Observe good personal hygiene. Food handlers should wash
their hands with soap and potable water thoroughly before preparing
food and after every interruption in food preparation, particularly
after having used the toilet.
- Prevent cross-contamination between fish tank water, raw
seafood and other food.
Advice to Public
(A) Purchase
- Buy food from reputable and reliable suppliers.
- Do not patronise illegal hawkers as their source of supply
may not be safe.
- Buy only those shellfish which are fresh, with intact shell
and free from abnormal odour.
(B) Preparation
- Wash seafood thoroughly before cooking.
- Scrub and rinse shellfish in clean water. Remove internal
organs of shellfish.
- Remove the shells of shellfish, as far as possible, before
cooking as it impedes heat penetration.
- Cook food thoroughly before consumption. High-risk food such
as oysters shall be cooked in boiling water for not less than
five minutes.
- Discard leftovers or otherwise store them properly in the
refrigerator at 4o C or below. Reheat leftovers thoroughly
before consumption.
- Observe good personal hygiene and prevent cross-contamination.
(C) Consumption
- Consume seafood as soon as possible.
- If seafood is not consumed immediately, they should be:
- packed and stored at 4o C or below.
- separated from raw food.
- consumed within 1 to 2 days.
- Avoid consuming the internal organs of shellfish.
- The elderly, children, pregnant women and persons with lowered
immunity should be careful when choosing food especially high
risk food, such as sashimi and oysters to be eaten raw.
|
| REFERENCES |
|
1
|
Sutherland
J & Varnam A. Enterotoxin-producing Staphylococcus, Shigella,
Yersinia, Vibrio, Aeromonas and Plesiomonas. In: Blackburn
CW & McClure PJ., editors. Foodborne Pathogens. Hazards,
Risk Analysis and Control. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing
Limited; 2000. P.358-415. |
|
2
|
Oliver JD & Japer
JB. Vibrio species. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR & Montville
TJ. Food Microbiology ¡V Fundamentals and Frontiers. Washington
DC: ASM Press; 1997. P.228-264. |
|
3
|
FAO/WHO. Joint FAO/WHO
Activities on Risk Assessment of Microbiological Hazards in
Foods. Preliminary Document. Hazard Identification, Exposure
Assessment and Hazard Characterization of Vibrio spp. in Seafood.
Available at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/vibrio.pdf |
|
4
|
Heymann DL. Cholerae
and Other Vibrioses. In: Control of Communicable Diseases
Manual, 18th Edition. Washington DC: American Public
Health Association; 2004. P.103-117 |
|
5
|
United States Food
and Drug Administration Centre for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition. Bad Bug Book: Vibrio cholerae Serogroup
O1. Available from: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap7.html |
|
6
|
International Commission
on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Vibrio cholerae.
In: Microorganisms in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial
Pathogens. London: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996.
P.414-425. |
|
7
|
United States Food
and Drug Administration Centre for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition. Bad Bug Book: Vibrio cholerae Serogroup Non-O1.
Available from: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap8.html |
|
8
|
Department of Health,
HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable Infectious Diseases
in 1999. In: Public Health and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.9
No.2; May 2000. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v9n2.pdf
|
|
9
|
Department of Health,
HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable Infectious Diseases
in 2000. In: Public Health and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.10
No.4; August 2001. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v10n4.pdf
|
|
10
|
Department of Health,
HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable Infectious Diseases
in 2001. In: Public Health and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.11
No.3; June 2002. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v11n3.pdf
|
|
11
|
Department of Health,
HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable Infectious Diseases
in 2002. In: Public Health and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.12
No.4; August 2003. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v12n4.pdf |
|
12
|
Department of Health,
HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable Infectious Diseases
in 2002. In: Public Health and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.13
No.3; June 2004. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v13n3.pdf |
|
13
|
International Commission
on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
In: Microorganisms in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial
Pathogens. London: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996.
P.426-435. |
|
14
|
United States Food
and Drug Administration Centre for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition. Bad Bug Book: Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Available
from: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap9.html |
|
15
|
Kaysner CA. Vibrio
species. In: Lund BM, Baird-Parker TC & Gould GW, editors.
The Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food. Maryland:
Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 2000. P.1336-1362. |
|
16
|
Chai TJ & Pace
JL. Vibrio parahaemolyticus. In: Hui YH, Pierson
MD & Gorham JR, editors. Foodborne Disease Handbook Volume
1: Bacterial Pathogens, 2nd Edition. New York:
Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2001. P.407-437. |
|
17
|
Dalsgaard et al..
Vibrio vulnificus. In: Hui YH, Pierson MD & Gorham
JR, editors. Foodborne Disease Handbook Volume 1: Bacterial
Pathogens, 2nd Edition. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2001.
P.439-470 |
|
18
|
European Commission.
Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures
Relating to Public Health on Vibrio vulnificus and
Vibrio parahaemolyticus (in raw and undercooked seafood)
(adopted on 19-20 September 2001). |
|
19
|
United States Food
and Drug Administration Centre for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition. Bad Bug Book: Vibrio vulnificus. Available
from: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap10.html |
|
20
|
International Commission
on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Vibrio vulnificus.
In: Microorganisms in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial
Pathogens. London: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1996.
P.436-439. |
|
21
|
Gram L & Huss
HH. Fresh and Processed Fish and Shellfish. In: Lund BM, Baird-Parker
TC & Gould GW, editors. The Microbiological Safety and
Quality of Food Volume I. Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc;
2000. P.472-506. |
|
22
|
International Commission
on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Fish and Fish
Products. In: Microorganisms in Foods 6. Microbial Ecology
of Food Commodities. London: Blackie Academic & Professional;
1998. P.130-189. |
|
23
|
Adams MR & Moss
MO. Bacterial Agents of Foodborne Illness. In: Food Microbiology
2nd Edition. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry;
2000. P.184-271. |
|
24
|
Xu H et al. Occurrence
and Distribution of Vibrios in Fishes and Shellfishes in Coastal
Waters of Hong Kong. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. 1998; 17: 545-553. |
|
25
|
Yam WC et al. Abundance
of Clinical Enteric Bacterial Pathogens in Coastal Waters
and Shellfish. Water Research. 1999; 34: 51-56. |
|
26
|
Food and Environmental
Hygiene Department, HKSAR Government. Guidelines on the Filtration
and Disinfection Facilities for Fish Tank Water. Available
at: http://www.fehd.gov.hk/pleasant_environment/library/fish_tank/guide.html |
|
| Annex I - Selected Sites for
Water Sampling |
| Category |
Sampling Site (Code) |
| Fish Culture Zones |
Tap Mun, Sai Kung (FCZ7) *
Kau Sai, Sai Kung (FCZ16) *
Cheung Sha Wan, Lantau Island (FCZ26) *
Tung Lung Chau, Sai Kung (FCZ29) * |
| Open Waters |
Deep Bay (DM3) †
Mirs Bay (MM15) †
Port Shelter (PM7) †
Southern, between Cheung Chau & Lamma Island (SM6) † |
| Shoreline Waters |
Aberdeen Wholesale Fish Market (ABR) ‡
Cheung Sha Wan Wholesale Fish Market (CSW) ‡
Kwun Tong Wholesale Fish Market (KT) ‡
Tso Wo Hang, Sai Kung (TWH) ¡± |
| Typhoon Shelters |
Tuen Mun (NT1) †
Sam Ka Tsuen, Lei Yue Mun (VT3) †
Aberdeen, West (WT3) † |
* Designated fish culture zones governed by AFCD. Sampled by
AFCD during even months.
† Designated water quality monitoring stations under the
Marine Water Quality Monitoring Programme of EPD. Sampled by EPD
during odd months (Typhoon Shelters) and even months (Open Waters).
‡ Designated wholesale fish markets governed by the Fish
Marketing Organization, a statutory body established under the
Marine Fish (Marketing) Ordinance, Cap 291 which was administered
by AFCD. Sampled by AFCD during odd months.
¡± A popular seawater abstraction point where seawater was less
likely to be polluted as suggested by EPD. Sampled by FEHD during
odd months.
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|